Prior to the financial crisis that crippled the economy in 2008, many insurers of community banks were routinely offering multi-year policies for management liability and financial institution bond insurance coverage. During this time, the healthy economy helped banks of all sizes post stellar earnings and provided relative stability in the insurance market for purchasing these lines of coverage.
When the economy started to falter and banks began to deteriorate, the insurance market shifted. According to the FDIC, a total of 518 banks have failed since the beginning of 2008. The same insurance carriers that were offering multi-year policies held the bill for the failed financial institutions. The FDIC, depositors, former employees, shareholders, regulators and other stakeholders started looking toward the insurance carriers for restitution. The insurance market for the directors and officers of community banks hardened: terms and conditions became more restrictive, premiums and retentions rose, and even the healthiest institutions were not able to obtain multi-year policies.
Fast forward to 2016. The economy is recovering and the banking and insurance markets have stabilized again. Carriers have started to offer multi-year policies again, but on a more selective basis.
Deciding if multi-year policies make sense for a bank requires careful consideration of all the above points. Insurance buyers will see the value in truly guaranteed-rates as well as multi-year policies that are non-cancelable providing many benefits over traditional annual policies.
As a specialty broker, AmWINS can help navigate the benefits and challenges of multi-year policies. Our professional lines brokers have access to a variety of proprietary tools and resources to assist with marketing, negotiating coverage and providing the best insurance solutions in addition to claim advocacy. Add that to our unmatched market access and superior customer service, and we are well prepared to serve the needs of retail agents and their clients.
This article was authored by Joe Catalano, a professional lines broker with AmWINS Brokerage of Illinois.
Legal Disclaimer. Views expressed here do not constitute legal advice. The information contained herein is for general guidance of matter only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Discussion of insurance policy language is descriptive only. Every policy has different policy language. Coverage afforded under any insurance policy issued is subject to individual policy terms and conditions. Please refer to your policy for the actual language.
(c) 2017 AmWINS Group, Inc.
Construction contract negotiations, which determine the kind and amount of insurance required for a construction project, can be time-consuming, complicated and frustrating. Project owners require contractors on a project to name the project owner as an additional insured on the contractor’s casualty insurance program. It's important that both project owners and contractors understand the coverage provided by these additional insured endorsements. This article discusses four common ISO additional insured endorsements related to commercial general liability policies purchased by contractors, including their limitations, conditions and exclusions.
A common complication during the claim process is the late reporting of claims. In some cases, a late claim can put the agent or broker's own E&O policy in jeopardy. There are many reasons for missing a reporting deadline; however, in most cases, they will not matter to the insurer or the courts. This article discusses typical claim reporting requirements, common causes of late reporting, and recommendations to mitigate the risk of late notice claim denials.
The theories of recovery, as well as the ensuing loss provisions, contained in property insurance policies are often complex and, at times, seemingly in conflict. Although a policy may not directly address these theories, their application by courts plays a significant role in the coverage determination process after the claim. It is essential that brokers understand the primary theories of recovery – Efficient Proximate Cause, the Concurrent Causation Doctrine, and the Anti-Concurrent Causation Doctrine – in order to navigate the challenging post-claim process and effectively serve their clients.
The Thomas Fire, the largest fire in California's history, subsequently led to a mudslide on January 9, 2018, which caused a massive amount of damage in Santa Barbara and Ventura counties. The California Insurance Commissioner has issued a formal notice reminding carriers to pay for damage, citing the "efficient proximate cause doctrine." This article takes a closer look at the doctrine and how it has been challenged in court over the years.
Ordinance or Law insurance coverage provides limited protection for costs associated with repairing, rebuilding, or constructing a structure when physical damage to the structure by a covered cause of loss triggers an ordinance or law. Compliance with ordinances and laws after a loss can add 50% or more to the cost of a claim. This article will help you educate your insureds on exclusions and limitations and help them take a proactive approach to their insurance program.
In 2017, the issue of sexual harassment – especially in the workplace – gained greater awareness as accusations of harassment by high-profile individuals were constantly in the news. In many cases, sexual harassment lawsuits seriously impacted businesses and their respective insurers. Employment Practices Liability Insurance not only provides protection against employee lawsuits, but can also help your clients mitigate their sexual harassment risks.